Just days before being murdered, Judge Roll had issued a preliminary 
ruling with intent to rule against the case of 'United States of America
 v. $333,520.00 in United States Currency et al'. The subject of the 
case involved giving the Obama Administration power to seize citizens' 
assets regardless of whether or not it could be proven that they 
committed any sort of crimes. And Judge Roll had planned to declare it 
unconstitutional.
http://dockets.justia.com/docket/arizona/azdce/4:2010cv00703/568697/
Even though previous presidents have gained 
similar asset-seizing powers, the recent case would have represented a 
significant milestone in overriding due process by giving the federal 
government arbitrary power to steal private property without legitimate 
cause. And regardless of whether the one doing the seizing was a 
Democrat or a Republican, Judge Roll would have made the same ruling 
because, to him, it was a matter of constitutionality, not partisan 
politics.
http://www.naturalnews.com/031326_Judge_John_Roll_Giffords.html
 
No comments:
Post a Comment